Talk:Click removal using the Spectrogram view


 * A very useful tutorial. Is it worth saying anything about where the clicks come from in the first place?  James (talk)
 * I think, yes, the relative uselessness of zero crossings on stereo tracks should be spelled out. They are only good for mono in my experience. James (talk)
 * Peter 23Sep12: Thanks for that feedback James. If we say where the clicks come from that should probably be in the top-level tutorial [Click Removal], from which I plan to link to this new one from; I'll have a look at that when I get some time.  Good point about zero-crossings I'll comment some more in the text about that, but I also note Steve's in-line ednote on this on the tutorial page.
 * Gale:23Sep12: in my experience Find Zero Crossings on stereo tracks looks and sounds OK about half to two-thirds of the time; better than not use it. Is there any answer to this problem? Allow the selection/cursor to move further in stereo tracks? Can the cursor/selection edge ever be at different points in the channels/tracks, so there would be a preference to allow this (within a few ms, reducing risk of audible desync?)
 * UPDATE Peter 23Sep12: In real life, James, I always use Brian Davies' excellent ClickRepair software package. It usually removes all the audible and semi-audible clicks.  Very occasionally it will miss a larg-event click and it is these rare occasions that I now use the workflow in this tutorial.  On the particular LP used for this sample when cleaned with CR there were no clicks left - so the sample in this workflow is taken from the raw capture prior to CR processing.

=Editorial comments moved to the Talk page for archive=