Talk:Bug:35


 * Gale: We store actual reports in the bug. but talk about what they mean here?
 * James: The MAIN purpose of the page is to have a summary of the current state of the bug. The top problem I am trying to solve is that the audit trail contains both useful and out of date information.  I do not want to read 112 comments to understand one bug.
 * James: Beyond that we can use the wiki page as we see fit. Wording for a dialog could take several comments to sort out.  To me it makes sense to use the wiki for that.  Wiki works really well for that.  Bugzilla doesn't.  I think we make a gradual change here as we find what works, not try to leap into making too radical a change in process all at once.
 * Gale: If anything I preferred the original idea of having a summary in the "Steps To Reproduce" in the bug (or add another field). It's an extra step to come to wiki, the link in bugzilla is not clickable and it's possible a summary is all that's needed. I think the bugzilla summary worked well in Bug 176. But why not use the "See also" link for the summary? We don't have two installations, so it won't be used otherwise.