Difference between revisions of "Talk:Design Topics"

From Audacity Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Answers/clarifications/)
(Clarify on LibAudacity ?)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''[[User:Galeandrews|Gale]] 09Dec09: '''
 
'''[[User:Galeandrews|Gale]] 09Dec09: '''
 
* "Discoverable interface": The one place that isn't discoverable according to user comments is the Track Drop-down menu.  
 
* "Discoverable interface": The one place that isn't discoverable according to user comments is the Track Drop-down menu.  
** Agreed.  I have ideas for a solution.
+
** '''James:''' Agreed.  I have ideas for a solution.
*  "LibAudacity (the module formerly known as Mezzo)": [[LibAudacity]] says it was replaced by Mezzo. Both can't be correct. I guess Hackers Guide is wrong?
+
* '''Gale:''' "LibAudacity (the module formerly known as Mezzo)": [[LibAudacity]] says it was replaced by Mezzo. Both can't be correct. I guess Hackers Guide is wrong?
** No, both are right.  LibAudacity was a concept, and Mezzo the actual code that started being written.  The concept did change in the process from just tidying up the audio processing code to completely re-writing it - which is why it never took off.
+
** '''James:''' No, both are right.  LibAudacity was a concept, and Mezzo the actual code that started being written.  The concept did change in the process from just tidying up the audio processing code to completely re-writing it - which is why it never took off.
 +
*** '''Gale:''' OK then I think this must be clarified on [[LibAudacity]].

Revision as of 08:49, 10 December 2009

Gale 09Dec09:

  • "Discoverable interface": The one place that isn't discoverable according to user comments is the Track Drop-down menu.
    • James: Agreed. I have ideas for a solution.
  • Gale: "LibAudacity (the module formerly known as Mezzo)": LibAudacity says it was replaced by Mezzo. Both can't be correct. I guess Hackers Guide is wrong?
    • James: No, both are right. LibAudacity was a concept, and Mezzo the actual code that started being written. The concept did change in the process from just tidying up the audio processing code to completely re-writing it - which is why it never took off.
      • Gale: OK then I think this must be clarified on LibAudacity.