Difference between revisions of "Talk:Feature Requests"
From Audacity Wiki
(Info about sponsorship rqst.) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| − | - | + | ==Sponsorship?== |
| + | * I've removed the request for sponsorship of features. To my knowledge it has never been taken up. It makes the whole project look more commercial than it is - so it is doing more harm than good. Where we've had sponsorship it's in the form of a company that wants a variant of Audacity, and they have contacted Dominic directly. [[User:James|James]] 04:24, 25 February 2008 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Voting Systems== | ||
[http://www.fevote.com/audacity Audacity suggestion board], compliments of FeVote.com. :) | [http://www.fevote.com/audacity Audacity suggestion board], compliments of FeVote.com. :) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 15: | ||
<span class="plainlinks">Although we had an alternative [http://audacityteam.org/FeatureRequest.php Beta Feature Request system] in place intended to make voting easier - there is some feedback on that system [[NewFeatureRequestSystemFeedback|here]] - unfortunately the script that operated the system did not prove to be reliably available. In the longer term we may introduce a new more interactive Feature Request system on our main website. | <span class="plainlinks">Although we had an alternative [http://audacityteam.org/FeatureRequest.php Beta Feature Request system] in place intended to make voting easier - there is some feedback on that system [[NewFeatureRequestSystemFeedback|here]] - unfortunately the script that operated the system did not prove to be reliably available. In the longer term we may introduce a new more interactive Feature Request system on our main website. | ||
| − | |||
[[Feature Requests|Return to Feature Requests]] | [[Feature Requests|Return to Feature Requests]] | ||
Revision as of 12:24, 25 February 2008
This page is only for discussion of the Feature Requests process itself. This includes design of the page, the voting process etc.
Sponsorship?
- I've removed the request for sponsorship of features. To my knowledge it has never been taken up. It makes the whole project look more commercial than it is - so it is doing more harm than good. Where we've had sponsorship it's in the form of a company that wants a variant of Audacity, and they have contacted Dominic directly. James 04:24, 25 February 2008 (PST)
Voting Systems
Audacity suggestion board, compliments of FeVote.com. :)
Micropat 23:48, 26 September 2007 (PDT)
Although we had an alternative Beta Feature Request system in place intended to make voting easier - there is some feedback on that system here - unfortunately the script that operated the system did not prove to be reliably available. In the longer term we may introduce a new more interactive Feature Request system on our main website.
