Difference between revisions of "User talk:James/StudentApplicationTips"

From Audacity Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Doing it this way for a reason.)
(a few more words...)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
* '''[[User:Galeandrews|Gale]] 20 Mar 09, 19:35 UTC:''' James, an excellent read, but is this a good idea? As a casual prospective student reading this, unaware of how open source works, might I think "Uh? are there splits among the developers?". People will find this without you pointing people to it privately. Many times better IMHO, to modify [[GSoC Selection Criteria]] (currently linked to on [[GSoC Skills]] and [[GSoC FAQ]]) to be explicitly a blog page with developer "takes" on what will influence us into selecting one applicant rather than another. Otherwise, as I said I think we should just delete [[GSoC Selection Criteria]] for the same reasons we deleted the "Writing Proposals" page - having a page that is merely a link to the ideas of some other organisation doesn't look terribly good.
 
* '''[[User:Galeandrews|Gale]] 20 Mar 09, 19:35 UTC:''' James, an excellent read, but is this a good idea? As a casual prospective student reading this, unaware of how open source works, might I think "Uh? are there splits among the developers?". People will find this without you pointing people to it privately. Many times better IMHO, to modify [[GSoC Selection Criteria]] (currently linked to on [[GSoC Skills]] and [[GSoC FAQ]]) to be explicitly a blog page with developer "takes" on what will influence us into selecting one applicant rather than another. Otherwise, as I said I think we should just delete [[GSoC Selection Criteria]] for the same reasons we deleted the "Writing Proposals" page - having a page that is merely a link to the ideas of some other organisation doesn't look terribly good.
  
* '''[[User:James|James]]:''' Let me do it this way, OK?  We do say elsewhere that different mentors have different views and opinions.  It's fairest to the students to know that what I say here is just ''my'' opinion.  I believe I am more gung-ho about new features than anyone else is, for example.  Learning how different opinions work in practice is part of their learning experience, and I really don't see us losing a good student over it perhaps not being 100% clear from the outset.  This is also an easier page for me to write and maintain.  Being under my User: page I can be brutal about reverting edits that I don't like.  I actually think it would be great if other people involved created their own tips pages too....
+
* '''[[User:James|James]]:''' Let me do it this way, OK?  We do say elsewhere that different mentors have different views and opinions.  It's fairest to the students to know that what I say here is just ''my'' opinion.  I believe I am more gung-ho about new features than anyone else is, for example.  Learning how different opinions work in practice is part of their learning experience, and I really don't see us losing a good student over it perhaps not being 100% clear from the outset that we work well as a team.  It's more important to not give the impression to students that my criteria are universal - and particularly to sign post that the mentors who mentor will be the making selection decisions.  This is also an easier page for me to write and maintain.  Being under my User: page I can be brutal about reverting edits that I don't like.  I actually think it would be great if other people involved created their own tips pages too....

Revision as of 21:39, 20 March 2009

  • Gale 20 Mar 09, 19:35 UTC: James, an excellent read, but is this a good idea? As a casual prospective student reading this, unaware of how open source works, might I think "Uh? are there splits among the developers?". People will find this without you pointing people to it privately. Many times better IMHO, to modify GSoC Selection Criteria (currently linked to on GSoC Skills and GSoC FAQ) to be explicitly a blog page with developer "takes" on what will influence us into selecting one applicant rather than another. Otherwise, as I said I think we should just delete GSoC Selection Criteria for the same reasons we deleted the "Writing Proposals" page - having a page that is merely a link to the ideas of some other organisation doesn't look terribly good.
  • James: Let me do it this way, OK? We do say elsewhere that different mentors have different views and opinions. It's fairest to the students to know that what I say here is just my opinion. I believe I am more gung-ho about new features than anyone else is, for example. Learning how different opinions work in practice is part of their learning experience, and I really don't see us losing a good student over it perhaps not being 100% clear from the outset that we work well as a team. It's more important to not give the impression to students that my criteria are universal - and particularly to sign post that the mentors who mentor will be the making selection decisions. This is also an easier page for me to write and maintain. Being under my User: page I can be brutal about reverting edits that I don't like. I actually think it would be great if other people involved created their own tips pages too....