Difference between revisions of "User talk:Suf"
Galeandrews (talk | contribs) (Note to Suf) |
m (Reverting vandalism) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Hi Suf | + | Hi Suf |
| − | + | I see we're both slipping into using <nowiki>{{shortcut}}</nowiki> for emphasising text that needs to be typed e.g. {{shortcut|<nowiki> <nowiki> </nowiki> </nowiki>}} though we're telling others not use templates for non-intended purposes. So I think we have to either state this is an acceptable usage of <nowiki> {{shortcut}} </nowiki>; or simply '''bolden''' the text; or create another template for general text emphasis. On the whole I prefer to use <nowiki>{{shortcut}}</nowiki> only for shortcuts, and think another template is possibly best, at least for power users. If we had another template I have in mind a (not too light) blue in keeping with the site e.g. | |
| + | "You need to type <span style="background:#82CAFA; font-weight:bold"> <nowiki> <nowiki> </nowiki> </nowiki></span> for this to work." | ||
| + | |||
| + | This might work better e.g. to emphasise <span style="background:#82CAFA; font-weight:bold">Pause</span> in that "splitting recordings" tutorial. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is an alternative lighter background: | ||
| + | |||
| + | "You need to type <span style="background:#AFDCEC; font-weight:bold"> <nowiki> <nowiki> </nowiki> </nowiki></span> for this to work." | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Is this important enough to justify another template? It's only a simple one, so would not take long. | ||
Gale | Gale | ||
Latest revision as of 19:30, 16 February 2011
Hi Suf
I see we're both slipping into using {{shortcut}} for emphasising text that needs to be typed e.g. </nowiki> though we're telling others not use templates for non-intended purposes. So I think we have to either state this is an acceptable usage of {{shortcut}} ; or simply bolden the text; or create another template for general text emphasis. On the whole I prefer to use {{shortcut}} only for shortcuts, and think another template is possibly best, at least for power users. If we had another template I have in mind a (not too light) blue in keeping with the site e.g.
"You need to type <nowiki> </nowiki> for this to work."
This might work better e.g. to emphasise Pause in that "splitting recordings" tutorial.
This is an alternative lighter background:
"You need to type <nowiki> </nowiki> for this to work."
Is this important enough to justify another template? It's only a simple one, so would not take long.
Gale
